nachverstehbar), can be re-effectuated in their acts (nacherzeugbar), and can be handed down through a tradition (tradierbar).¹ Although this product was born in a mental sphere, of the inventer or writer, its existence is "super temporal."² However, it is not clear how language contributes to the formation of meaning, whether language is a mere tool or a necessary condition for the possibility of meaning. Now with the revising of the Logical Investigations available in Husserliana XX,¹ especially the second volume, we have several texts dealing with this problematic articulation of meaning and experience as well as meaning and signs. These texts shed a new light on the relationship between Sinn (sense) and Bedeutung (meaning) as well as on the role of signs in the formation of an ideality. This is what I would like to examine. This study helps us understand the significant role Husserl grants language in "The Origin of Geometry," although this is not my focus here." /> An unpleasant but felicitous ambiguity - Vandevelde Pol | sdvig press