Critique.1 It is an imposing and magisterial commentary, running to over 800 pages, every one of which contains significant insights and displays admirable scholarship. My disagreement, in such a context, is minor. That said, at the end of the chapter I shall suggest, albeit very inchoately, a way in which this disagreement connects with some reservations that I have about Bird's fundamental project, which is to repudiate what he calls "traditionalist' interpretations of Kant in favour of what he calls a "revolutionary' interpretation" /> Bird on Kant's mathematical antinomies - Moore A. W. | sdvig press