observe the symptom presentation and judge whether it falls within preconceived disease categories, rather than share it. This attitude incurs two immediate risks. First, the doctor's apprehension of what the patient presents may be shallow, leading to misunderstandings of various extent and importance even from a diagnostic point of view. Second, the patient may feel the doctor lacks interest in her particular situation, causing her to withdraw, which, in turn, may threaten the outcome of the consultation. On a broader scale, the scant attention paid to body experience limits the competence of doctors. If we establish a way of "thinking" body experience that is in consonance with its real character in the life of the individual, doctors may have a frame of reference that will make it easier for them to become attuned to, and learn from, symptom presentations. They will also have a more explicit reference for the experience of their own bodies, thus increasing their self-awareness and enabling them more fully to grasp the experiences of their patients. At the level of the medical profession, the "cases" of clinical discourse may be transformed from the anonymity of diseases to the particular experience of the individual, but still with the focus on the body. Lastly, the gap between practice and the reflection on practice may be narrowed. It is especially important for a practice-based discipline like family medicine/general practice to make practice itself the core of professional reflection." /> Grasping the existential anatomy - Rudebeck Carl Edvard | sdvig press